Change text size Change text size

Extending Patent Life: Is it in Australia's Economic Interests?

Industry Commission staff information paper

This paper by Nicholas Gruen, Ian Bruce and Gerard Prior was released on 3 June 1996.

See also

Contents

Preliminaries
Cover, Copyright, Contents, Acknowledgments and Executive Summary

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 The economics and political economy of intellectual property
Retrospective and prospective changes to patent terms
International issues
Producers' and consumers' interests and the political economy of intellectual property

Chapter 3 Methodology

Chapter 4 The volume of patents
Patent applications and grants
The stock of patents in Australia

Chapter 5 The value of patents
The decline in patent values over the patent term
Aggregating to the national level
Applying the model to Australia

Chapter 6 Results

Chapter 7 Conclusions
Multilateral extension of patent terms is not in Australia's economic interests
Agreeing to extend patent terms may have been in Australia's broader interests
The political economy of IP seems weighted in favour of net producers/exporters of IP
Improving information
Opportunities for further research

Appendix A Quantity Data

Appendix B Unit Value Estimations

Appendix C Sectoral Distributions

Appendix D Annual Costs of Extending Patent Terms

References

Download this publication

Printed copies

This report is available only on the website.

Have your say

We value your comments about this publication and encourage you to complete and submit the publications feedback form.