Financial Performance of Government Trading Enterprises 2004-05 to 2005-06
Commission research paper
Financial Performance of Government Trading Enterprises 2004-05 to 2005-06 was released on 26 July 2007. It forms part of the Commission's research into the performance of Australian industries and the progress of microeconomic reform.
Download this publication
The performance of 85 government trading enterprises (GTEs) providing services in key sectors of the economy - including electricity, water, urban transport, railways, ports and forestry - are presented in this report. These GTEs controlled about 3.3 per cent of Australia's non-household assets ($197 billion), and accounted for around 2 per cent of GDP in 2005-06.
Overall, the profitability of GTEs increased by 61 per cent in 2005-06 with improvements recorded in all sectors compared with the previous year. The largest improvements were in the electricity, railways and forestry sectors. However, profitability varied among GTEs:
- profits declined for 37 per cent of GTEs;
- eleven GTEs (six in the water sector) failed to report a profit; and
- for most sectors recording a profit improvement, much of this was derived from the performance of only one of the GTEs in that sector (between 39 and 65 per cent of increased profits).
Although the return on assets improved on average, about half of the monitored GTEs earned less than the long-term bond rate in 2005-06. This implies that an even greater proportion did not earn a commercial rate of return (which would include a margin for risk).
The poor financial performance of many GTEs underscores a longer-term failure to operate these businesses on a fully commercial basis in accordance with competition policy agreement undertakings.
In total, GTEs made dividend payments to owner governments of almost $5.6 billion in 2005 06 ($3 billion excluding Telstra). In addition, tax and tax equivalent payments totalled $3.3 billion ($1.9 billion excluding Telstra).
Asset valuation methods influence capital management through their effect on performance measurement, transparency and accountability. A survey of 58 GTEs revealed that 41 per cent used an historical cost method in 2005-06, even though the optimal deprival value method has been endorsed by governments as the preferred method for valuing GTE assets.
The economic rate of return (ERR) is a measure of capital management efficiency that has regard for the capital as well as the cash streams of income. The more widely used accounting rate of return (ARR) only captures cash streams of income. Estimates for 56 GTEs over the period 2000-01 to 2003-04 indicate that:
- many GTEs did not achieve a return on assets exceeding the risk-free rate using either the ERR (42 per cent of GTEs) or the ARR (52 per cent of GTEs); and
- ERR estimates were higher than those of the ARR.