Horizontal fiscal equalisation

Submissions

Submissions

Submissions received for the Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation public inquiry.

* Submissions marked with an asterisk have omitted 'In confidence' content - part or all of the submission is not online.

# Hash denotes some attachments are not available online. Contact the project team for access if necessary.

% Percent symbol denotes scanned image PDFs which are not readable by some screen readers. For help read our accessibility statement.

Submissions received before the release of the draft report are listed here.
No.NamePagesReceived
1 PDF documentCommonwealth Grants Commission (PDF - 210.5 KB) 408/06/2017
2 PDF documentGeorge Williams (PDF - 110.0 KB) 105/06/2017
 Word documentGeorge Williams (Word - 82.5 KB)  
3 PDF documentDoug Buckley (PDF - 104.9 KB) 207/06/2017
 Word documentDoug Buckley (Word - 20.4 KB)  
4 PDF documentJulie Matheson for Western Australia Party (PDF - 67.9 KB) 314/06/2017
5 PDF documentJohn Pitman (PDF - 90.0 KB) 214/06/2017
 Word documentJohn Pitman (Word - 16.2 KB)  
6 PDF documentWilson Tuckey (PDF - 109.0 KB) 316/06/2017
 Word documentWilson Tuckey (Word - 17.1 KB)  
7 PDF documentJohn McAuley (PDF - 231.7 KB) 420/06/2017
8 PDF documentPeter Brohier (PDF - 177.9 KB) 1120/06/2017
 Word documentPeter Brohier (Word - 37.5 KB)  
PDF documentAttachments 1-19 (PDF - 5.9 MB) % image PDF6020/06/2017
PDF documentAttachment 20: Omega transport plan: Linking Victoria and Tasmania (PDF - 172.2 KB) 503/07/2017
 Word documentAttachment 20: Omega transport plan: Linking Victoria and Tasmania (Word - 19.4 KB)  
PDF documentAttachment 21: Letter from Australian Government House of Representatives Standing Committee on Petitions (PDF - 195.7 KB) 130/08/2017
9 PDF documentPeter Abelson (PDF - 298.8 KB) 2922/06/2017
 Word documentPeter Abelson (Word - 230.0 KB)  
10 PDF documentWealth Wisdom Pty Ltd (PDF - 402.0 KB) 1723/06/2017
 Word documentWealth Wisdom Pty Ltd (Word - 41.6 KB)  
11 PDF documentChamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia (CCIWA) (PDF - 4.3 MB) 1227/06/2017
12 PDF documentPut Western Australia First (PDF - 562.4 KB) 627/06/2017
13 PDF documentGreat Northern Telecommunications (PDF - 111.9 KB) 228/06/2017
 Word documentGreat Northern Telecommunications (Word - 718.0 KB)  
14 PDF documentWayne Muller (PDF - 908.1 KB) 728/06/2017
15 PDF documentWA Government (PDF - 1.2 MB) 12229/06/2017
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 382.9 KB) 129/06/2017
16 PDF documentJames McDonald (PDF - 351.2 KB) 429/06/2017
17 PDF documentChris Egan (PDF - 160.1 KB) 628/06/2017
 Word documentChris Egan (Word - 27.4 KB)  
18 PDF documentAustralian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) (PDF - 425.2 KB) 329/06/2017
19 PDF documentJanine Harding (PDF - 60.3 KB) 130/06/2017
20 PDF documentLock the Gate Alliance (PDF - 204.8 KB) 230/06/2017
21 PDF documentChamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland (PDF - 223.7 KB) 330/06/2017
22 PDF documentParliamentary Liberal Party of WA (PDF - 1.1 MB) 16
 Word documentParliamentary Liberal Party of WA (Word - 2.8 MB)  
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 78.7 KB) 130/06/2017
 Word documentCover letter (Word - 12.1 KB)  
23 PDF documentAssociation of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) (PDF - 590.9 KB) 430/06/2017
24 PDF documentGrattan Institute (PDF - 288.9 KB) 1030/06/2017
25 PDF documentSouth Australian Government (PDF - 441.0 KB) 2630/06/2017
26 PDF documentBusiness SA (PDF - 97.6 KB) 630/06/2017
27 PDF documentNSW Business Chamber (PDF - 731.8 KB) 930/06/2017
28 PDF documentTasmanian State Government (PDF - 568.7 KB) 5030/06/2017
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 157.4 KB) 130/06/2017
29 PDF documentChamber of Minerals and Energy of Western Australia (PDF - 237.3 KB) 230/06/2017
30 PDF documentTasmanian Greens (PDF - 170.1 KB) 230/06/2017
31 PDF documentNorthern Territory Opposition (PDF - 296.7 KB) 330/06/2017
32 PDF documentQueensland Government (PDF - 3.6 MB) 1630/06/2017
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 316.5 KB) 130/06/2017
33 PDF documentThe Australia Institute (PDF - 477.1 KB) 830/06/2017
34 PDF documentMinerals Council of Australia (PDF - 178.0 KB) 730/06/2017
35 PDF documentWA Federal Liberal Members and Senators (PDF - 293.6 KB) 530/06/2017
36 PDF documentWA Federal Parliamentary Labor Party (PDF - 154.0 KB) 630/06/2017
37 PDF documentRio Tinto (PDF - 41.9 KB) 303/07/2017
38 PDF documentNeil Warren (PDF - 645.5 KB) 630/06/2017
 Word documentNeil Warren (Word - 101.7 KB)  
39 PDF documentRebecca White (Member of Parliament) (PDF - 149.8 KB) 303/07/2017
 Word documentRebecca White (Member of Parliament) (Word - 36.8 KB)  
40 PDF documentAustralian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PDF - 419.3 KB) 803/07/2017
41 PDF documentMichael Chaney, Andrew Forrest, John Poynton and Nigel Satterley (PDF - 105.7 KB) 104/07/2017
42 PDF documentBHP Billiton (PDF - 1.1 MB) 204/07/2017
43 PDF documentParliamentary National Party of Western Australia (PDF - 507.8 KB) 1005/07/2017
44 PDF documentSenator Peter Georgiou (PDF - 561.7 KB) 906/07/2017
45 PDF documentPauline Hanson’s One Nation WA (PDF - 331.5 KB) 1007/07/2017
46 PDF documentWestern Australian Local Government Association (PDF - 423.3 KB) 1410/07/2017
47 PDF documentBusiness Council of Australia (PDF - 401.5 KB) 1210/07/2017
48 PDF documentMinerals Council of Australia (PDF - 641.2 KB) 2814/07/2017
49 PDF documentACT Government (PDF - 1.1 MB) 9212/07/2017
 Word documentACT Government (Word - 813.0 KB)  
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 94.6 KB) 212/07/2017
50 PDF documentJohn Mcauley (PDF - 292.4 KB) 419/07/2017
51 PDF documentNorthern Territory Government (PDF - 692.9 KB) 4426/07/2017
52 PDF documentNSW Government (PDF - 1.5 MB) 6431/07/2017
53 PDF documentVictorian Government (PDF - 358.0 KB) 2601/08/2017
54 PDF documentJim Hancock (PDF - 301.7 KB) 1302/08/2017
 Word documentJim Hancock (Word - 117.2 KB)  
55 PDF documentAustralian Bankers' Association (ABA) (PDF - 164.2 KB) 429/08/2017
56 PDF documentArthur Downing (PDF - 129.3 KB) 204/09/2017
 Word documentArthur Downing (Word - 17.6 KB)  

Submissions received after the release of the draft report are listed here.
No.NamePagesReceived
DR57 PDF documentDoug Buckley (PDF - 68.1 KB) 217/10/2017
 Word documentDoug Buckley (Word - 14.8 KB)  
DR58 PDF documentJohn McAuley (PDF - 79.1 KB) 223/10/2017
PDF documentAttachment: HFE and effects on GST distributions (PDF - 449.2 KB) 428/11/2017
DR59 PDF documentJack Priestly (PDF - 33.7 KB) 127/10/2017
 Word documentJack Priestly (Word - 11.5 KB)  
DR60 PDF documentPhillip Bubb (PDF - 213.3 KB) 526/10/2017
 Word documentPhillip Bubb (Word - 24.2 KB)  
DR61 PDF documentCommonwealth Grants Commission (PDF - 789.8 KB) 2031/10/2017
PDF documentAttachment: Technical queries from the Productivity Commission on the Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) submission – Response by staff of the CGC (PDF - 371.2 KB) 609/11/2017
DR62 PDF documentJohn Pitman (PDF - 114.0 KB) 231/10/2017
 Word documentJohn Pitman (Word - 17.6 KB)  
DR63 PDF documentRebecca White (PDF - 330.6 KB) 202/11/2017
DR64 PDF documentDavid Burt (PDF - 114.4 KB) 213/04/2018
DR65 PDF documentAustralian Conservation Foundation (PDF - 153.0 KB) 408/11/2017
DR66 PDF documentTasmanian Council of Social Service (TasCOSS) (PDF - 546.8 KB) 408/11/2017
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 281.5 KB) 108/11/2017
DR67 PDF documentKen Clarke (PDF - 47.1 KB) 109/11/2017
 Word documentKen Clarke (Word - 15.5 KB)  
DR68 PDF documentMichael Dillon (PDF - 102.5 KB) 209/11/2017
 Word documentMichael Dillon (Word - 17.6 KB)  
DR69 PDF documentNorthern Territory Government (PDF - 493.4 KB) 3209/11/2017
DR70 PDF documentInsurance Council of Australia (PDF - 74.8 KB) 409/11/2017
DR71 PDF documentSaul Eslake (PDF - 197.0 KB) 509/11/2017
DR72 PDF documentPut Western Australia First Party (PWAFP) (PDF - 271.5 KB) 1809/11/2017
DR73 PDF documentAustralian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) (PDF - 407.7 KB) 210/11/2017
DR74 PDF documentTasmanian Government (PDF - 406.2 KB) 4210/11/2017
DR75 PDF documentSouth Australian Council of Social Service (SACOSS) (PDF - 132.8 KB) 310/11/2017
 Word documentSouth Australian Council of Social Service (SACOSS) (Word - 29.4 KB)  
DR76 PDF documentParliamentary National Party (PNP) WA (PDF - 258.7 KB) 510/11/2017
DR77 PDF documentDamien Kelly (PDF - 134.4 KB) 210/11/2017
DR78 PDF documentNorthern Territory Opposition (PDF - 131.8 KB) 1710/11/2017
PDF documentLetter (PDF - 124.1 KB) 110/11/2017
 Word documentLetter (Word - 712.2 KB)  
DR79 PDF documentTasmanian Greens (PDF - 98.9 KB) 210/11/2017
DR80 PDF documentYothu Yindi Foundation (YYF) (PDF - 167.6 KB) 910/11/2017
PDF documentAttachment: Remote town unemployment figures (PDF - 97.1 KB) 110/11/2017
 Word documentAttachment: Remote town unemployment figures (Word - 13.9 KB)  
DR81 PDF documentACT Government (PDF - 1.2 MB) 7810/11/2017
DR82 PDF documentMinerals Council of Australia (MCA) (PDF - 144.6 KB) 210/11/2017
 Word documentMinerals Council of Australia (MCA) (Word - 207.1 KB)  
DR83 PDF documentWA Government (PDF - 310.3 KB) 4710/11/2017
DR84 PDF documentWestern Australian Council of Social Service (WACOSS) (PDF - 462.2 KB) 213/11/2017
DR85 PDF documentNSW Business Chamber (NSWBC) (PDF - 274.1 KB) 613/11/2017
DR86 PDF documentChamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia (CCIWA) (PDF - 1.1 MB) 1113/11/2017
DR87 PDF documentVictorian Government (PDF - 649.2 KB) 3013/11/2017
PDF documentAttachment: Public hearing presentation by Tim Pallas MP | Victorian Treasurer (PDF - 227.4 KB) 1317/11/2017
DR88 PDF documentPeter Brohier (PDF - 181.1 KB) 313/11/2017
 Word documentPeter Brohier (Word - 20.8 KB)  
PDF documentAttachment: Second submission (PDF - 48.6 KB) 317/11/2017
 Word documentAttachment: Second submission (Word - 15.5 KB)  
DR89 PDF documentSouth Australian Government (PDF - 163.7 KB) 1910/11/2017
DR90 PDF documentFinancial Services Council (FSC) (PDF - 321.7 KB) 314/11/2017
DR91 PDF documentInstitute of Public Affairs (PDF - 633.3 KB) 2414/11/2017
PDF documentCover letter (PDF - 117.7 KB) 214/11/2017
 Word documentCover letter (Word - 109.8 KB)  
DR92 PDF documentVictorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PDF - 332.5 KB) 215/11/2017
DR93 PDF documentVictorian Trades Hall Council (PDF - 467.3 KB) 215/11/2017
PDF documentAttachment: Response to questions raised during the public hearing (PDF - 603.9 KB) 208/12/2017
DR94 PDF documentBusiness SA (PDF - 272.9 KB) 721/11/2017
DR95 PDF documentCentral Land Council (PDF - 334.4 KB) 321/11/2017
DR96 PDF documentJonathan Pincus (PDF - 61.2 KB) 323/11/2017
DR97 PDF documentLaunceston Chamber of Commerce (PDF - 168.8 KB) 224/11/2017
 Word documentLaunceston Chamber of Commerce (Word - 97.5 KB)  
DR98 PDF documentCommunity and Public Sector Union (CPSU) NT (PDF - 177.0 KB) 327/11/2017
DR99 PDF documentMaster Builders NT (PDF - 205.2 KB) 1427/11/2017
 Word documentMaster Builders NT (Word - 78.3 KB)  
DR100 PDF documentBusiness Council of Australia (PDF - 7.2 MB) 229/11/2017
DR101 PDF documentAustralian Medical Association (NT) (PDF - 801.1 KB) 1028/11/2017
DR102 PDF documentJerome Fahrer and Vince FitzGerald (PDF - 631.1 KB) 3107/12/2017
DR103 PDF documentAnwar Shah (PDF - 804.0 KB) 6307/12/2017
DR104 PDF documentClimate Change our Future (PDF - 143.6 KB) 615/12/2017
 Word documentClimate Change our Future (Word - 113.8 KB)  
DR105 PDF documentTown of Port Hedland Council (PDF - 657.1 KB) 415/12/2017
DR106 PDF documentQueensland Government (PDF - 873.7 KB) 1418/12/2017
DR107 PDF documentParliamentary Liberal Party of WA (PDF - 147.4 KB) 214/12/2017
DR108 PDF documentWA Government (PDF - 206.8 KB) 1527/12/2017
DR109 PDF documentNSW Government (PDF - 813.8 KB) 4410/01/2018
DR110 PDF documentQueensland Nurses’ and Midwives’ Union (PDF - 620.4 KB) 424/01/2018
DR111 PDF documentTasmanian Government (PDF - 187.7 KB) 1019/01/2018
DR112 PDF documentJohn P McAuley (PDF - 410.2 KB) 429/01/2018
PDF documentAttachment: Restoring Equity in the Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation / GST Distribution System Main Points and supporting appendix (PDF - 342.2 KB) 601/04/2018
DR113 PDF documentTownsville City Council (PDF - 547.0 KB) 331/01/2018
DR114 PDF documentUnited Voice Queensland (PDF - 222.2 KB) 331/01/2018
DR115 PDF documentTownsville Enterprise Limited (PDF - 67.2 KB) 231/01/2018
DR116 PDF documentGriffith University (PDF - 509.5 KB) 731/01/2018
DR117 PDF documentQueensland Council of Unions (PDF - 118.1 KB) 931/01/2018
DR118 PDF documentQueensland Council of Social service (PDF - 170.6 KB) 431/01/2018
DR119 PDF documentQueensland Teachers’ Union of Employees (PDF - 61.6 KB) 431/01/2018
 Word documentQueensland Teachers’ Union of Employees (Word - 22.1 KB)  
DR120 PDF documentChamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland (PDF - 554.9 KB) 531/01/2018
DR121 PDF documentLocal Government Association Queensland (PDF - 228.8 KB) 301/02/2018
DR122 PDF documentOffice of Senator Peter Georgiou (PDF - 379.9 KB) 1102/02/2018
DR123 PDF documentPeter Urban (PDF - 78.0 KB) 405/02/2018
 Word documentPeter Urban (Word - 19.7 KB)  

No.Name Submission content
1 David Harris

When you have finished the inquiry and recommend what is a "fair" distribution of the GST to all States and Territories, could you please explain the "fairness" in plain English so that the average voter can understand how the distribution of the GST is in fact "fair" to all. Please do not hide the fairness (or otherwise) behind a mass of technical financial and economic jargon which would leave most people totally in the dark. i.e. not only must the recommended distribution be fair but also clearly seen to be fair. thank you

2 Eric Waterhouse

After researching the ownership of the Minerals in Australia I have found that the minerals are owned by the state this is enforced by Statue of Law, this would imply that by including the royalties into the Federal GST Breakdown is in contravention of the Statue of Law as this means all the states are receiving the royalties of these minerals which are not from the state that owns the mineral. By including the Mineral Royalties in the HFE leads to other states taking a share of the proceeds raised by the Mineral Royalties without contributing to the expense in developing the infrastructure spent by the state. It should be noted that the act of mining actually contributes a great amount to the GST revenue through the payments of GST on their operational invoices as there is a large turnover of goods and services which incur GST. It should now be noted that Queensland considered reducing the Mining Royalty to be applied to the coal from a potential Coal Mine which then makes a mockery of the Mineral Royalty inclusion in the GST Funds Distribution Calculations (Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation) as this reduces the amount included in the HFE calculations so they would be subsidised by other states. The Australian Constitution states that consolidated revenue (of which GST is paid from) shall be debited to each state based on the number of its people, this ensure that the Horizontal Equalisation is not discriminatory as per the requirement of the Australian Constitution. In addition the Australian Constitution states that the distribution of the funds in the consolidated revenue is only based on funds raised by the Federal Government which means including funds raised by states is unconstitutional. In including the Mineral Royalty in the GST Calculation it is also imposing a tax on the State Asset which is contravention of the Australian Constitution (114).

3 Rod Kerley

Surely 75% of GST could be allocated on a per Capita basis. The balance used as a equalisation fund and State share reduced by any levy or tax it placed on a national resource such as coal or iron ore and this be also placed in the equalisation fund.

4 Alan Wardrop

Regarding question 1d of the guidance note Does the current HFE system influence State policies to facilitate, restrict or tax the development of economic activity, and in particular energy and mineral resources? In the light of the current political debate and the treasurer's stated position regarding promotion of coal and coal seam gas extraction this appears to be aimed at forcing the states to comply with the federal liberal party's ideology and position. I strongly object to the use of the HFE process being used to force changes to legislation by democratically elected state governments, which must consider many factors including social and environmental concerns besides financial.

5 Roslyn Miles

How the current GST dispersal of monies is allocated and the ultimate responsibility of terms of reference does not seem explainable by the Treasurer or the members of the Commission itself. There seems to be little belief of fairness in this system by Western Australians. Our WA civilians are discriminated against by a system which rewards those states that have moratoriums on their exploration of commodities. It does not appear to create incentives for other states to exploit natural resources - but instead seems to produce a "welfare" mentality permeating across all other states. Our commodity royalties are supposedly protected within the Federation and the Constitution to be the property of the state. The current GST system appears to be redistribution by stealth of our royalty income. We are constantly being pushed into a budget deficit because we have our own income taken from us - and then to add insult to injury - we are given a handout by the Federal Government and then told how grateful we should be. This system is imposing debt on our state that will be borne by our children and grandchildren for generations to come. WA will reach a point that we will never be able to pay down the debt owing and will only be servicing the interest - and yet other states are posting surpluses. The Commonwealth Grants Commission seems to fail to understand the vast distances involved that the state government needs cover to provide services to citizens. The current GST allocation then replicates this denial of need for our state and then discriminates against every single citizen living here. We in WA are being told to expand gambling - in turn taking money from those that can least afford it - how can that be a moral or ethical solution - but the gambling royalties from the other states are ignored. Why are those people that live in WA valued so much less than those people in other states? This system is causing resentment and angst in WA.

6 Amanda Dear

To the extent that the Federal Government seeks to tie the distribution of GST to the issue of unconventional gas exploration and fracking as reported in the Australian, I would like to add my voice to the extreme concern such a move should generate in all Australians. As a matter of economics, it seems severely flawed. There are ample existing gas reserves in Australia and logically gas will be most economically extracted from the areas where it is more favourably received - as has been evident from the Queensland experience. As a matter of science, it is far from resolved that fracking does not have long term environmental consequences in sensitive areas and in particular in sensitive underground aquifers. In Queensland the initial understanding of the underground geology and hydrogeology was completely wrong in some areas – e.g. aquitards that were initially considered "impermeable" have later been shown to be different and/or have fissures etc / initial EIS documents by Arrow indicated the Condamine Alluvium, a vital water source, was separated from the relevant coal measures only to later be accepted as sitting within them in parts. Further, the regulator in Queensland has proven completely inadequate (including as to funding) to be “ahead” of industry developments and/or is significantly constrained by the lack of ability to impose disclosure on the part of operators. No comfort can be taken from the role State regulators are able to play, unless they are adequately funded and completely independent of Government influence. In short, until there is far more scientific evidence available, a precautionary approach must be adopted in sensitive areas and it is completely inappropriate to bypass sensible precaution by economic threats. As a matter of social conscience, it is repugnant for a Commonwealth Government to effectively impose its ideological agenda on a legitimately elected State Government with a different ideological or political approach.

7 Janet Cavanaugh Please accept this as a late submission to the Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation inquiry. I note that the terms of reference include specific reference to “State laws and policies restricting the development of energy resources.” This is curious, given that the states have the constitutional right to impose these laws and policies. There are several reasons why such laws and policies may exist. Key among them is protection of our water resources, including groundwater supplies. In the driest inhabited continent, protection of water needs to be paramount in all natural resource management decisions. Other key reasons why there may be restrictions on developing energy resources is climate change. We need to move quickly from a fossil-fuel dependent economy if we are to avert the worst excesses of climate change. Unconventional gas (tight sands gas, shale gas and coal seam gas) comes with a significant risk of increased greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional gas. This is due to the different extraction methods required which involves fracking and numerous smaller well-heads. We also need to phase out the use of coal to generate electricity and invest more in clean energy sources. Due to a future, warming climate, Australia will likely face major ecosystem collapse and loss of major tourism income streams (from, for example, the Great Barrier Reef). I believe it is unacceptable for the Federal Government to impose policy demands on the States and Territories in exchange for the GST revenue that funds our schools and hospitals, and that replaced previous existing state revenue streams. The GST must be distributed on a fair and objective basis to fund basic services needed by communities, and should not be used as a tool to blackmail states and territories into accepting invasive gasfields against the will of the voting public.
8 Wealth Wisdom Pty Ltd One important point that everybody seems to have missed. In the absence of a better GST deal, Western Australia could simply change the Royalty rate from 7.5% to 0.75% - with a 2% "charity" donation such as to telethon instead(to fully fund Ambulances etc.) This would elevate WA to 100% GST share, provide a better benefit to WA financially than the current system, and effectively eliminate the $5 Billion Royalty sharing from WA everybody is proposing continues. Before determining the the current system is fine, as all States and Territories contend, consider the impact of a solution such as, or similar to the above. It is not in the "National Interest" - but it would solve WA's low GST share and it is within the power of WA to do this.
9 Submissions on fracking and GST distribution The Commission has received a large number (5600 plus) of email submissions from private individuals expressing opinions on fracking. The submissions were received via a campaign platform, and are essentially identical.

To aid transparency, the text of the template submission is reproduced below. Due the large volume of submissions, it is impractical to list the names of all the individuals who put their names to such submissions.

These submissions are providing a valuable source of information about people's views on matters raised in the terms of reference for this inquiry. They are being considered by the Commissioners and staff, and will be drawn on in the preparation of the draft inquiry report.

*******
To the Productivity Commission,

I’m writing to make a submission to the Horizontal Fiscal Equalisation inquiry because I believe it is unacceptable for the Federal Government to impose policy demands on the States and Territories in exchange for the GST revenue that funds our schools and hospitals.

Many states have introduced moratoriums or even outright bans on unconventional gas and fracking in response to growing evidence that these activities are fundamentally unsustainable and harmful to community health, water resources and the future of rural communities.

This is entirely consistent with the States’ and Territories’ constitutional responsibility to manage natural resources and protect water resources and the environment.

Forcing the states to allow fracking in return for GST would be an extraordinary and unwarranted intervention in state affairs, and would create a real risk of contamination and depletion of irreplaceable groundwater.

We consider this to be a case of the Federal Government trying to blackmail state governments in a bid to promote the activities of multinational fracking corporations. It is an unethical step.

Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory have done nothing but what they were elected to do.

Anti-democratic intervention by the Productivity Commission or the Federal Government to force unsafe unconventional gas mining or unsustainable coal mining onto our communities will not be tolerated.

The GST must be distributed on a fair and objective basis to fund basic services needed by communities, and should not be used as a tool to blackmail states and territories into accepting invasive gasfields against the will of the voting public.