Migrant intake into Australia

Inquiry report

  • Immigration policy has enduring effects on many dimensions of Australian life. Getting the policy settings right is critical to maximising community wellbeing.
  • The current immigration system has generally served the interests of the broader community well. The key question is whether current policy settings are set to deliver the best outcomes for the Australian community over the longer term.
  • Australia's immigration policy is its de facto population policy. Decisions about immigration policy should be made within a broad context and explicitly take into account the associated economic, social and environmental impacts, including the differential impacts on state, territory and local governments. Community values and perspectives should inform the policy.
  • Australia's current immigration profile is projected to deliver a demographic dividend to Australia and higher economic output per person. By increasing the proportion of people in the workforce, immigration can reduce the impacts of population ageing, but it does not offer a long-term panacea — immigrants age too.
  • While some positive rate of immigration is likely to benefit Australia over the long term, the gains depend on having a system that attracts immigrants who are younger and more skilled, and policies that are responsive to economic, social and environmental conditions.
  • The Commission was asked to look at alternative ways of selecting migrants, including a specific proposal that uses price as the primary basis for rationing the permanent immigration quota.
    • Notwithstanding the downside risks and uncertainties associated with such an unprecedented system, replacing existing selection criteria with a price-based system could offer a fiscal benefit to the Australian Government.
    • The size of this benefit is highly contingent on the feasibility and credibility of enforcing tightened access to government-funded services for all non-humanitarian immigrants.
  • Government policies — including immigration policy — should not be driven solely by fiscal considerations. The relative merits of any policy needs to be assessed against a broader context that takes into account all the relevant dimensions of societal wellbeing.
  • The Commission does not support the price-based proposal.
  • There is scope for significant reforms within the current system that could deliver superior overall outcomes for the Australian community.
    • Some of the areas for improvement relate to enhancing the integration of immigrants once they are in Australia — including through more effective settlement services and measures to mitigate the risks of immigrant worker exploitation.
    • However, the biggest gains to Australia are likely to come from recalibrating the intake of permanent skilled immigrants. This would involve 'raising the bar' by shifting to a universal points test while tightening entry requirements relating to age, skills and English-language proficiency.
    • There is a strong case for a substantial increase in visa pricing in relation to some elements of the family reunion stream. This would provide scope to recoup at least a portion of the high fiscal costs typically associated with immigrants in this category. In the medium term, the allocation of parent visas should be revised.
  • A stronger evidence base is required to inform future immigration policy. This requires further investment in data collection, integration and dissemination, and data analytics capacity.