Unsolicited emails claiming to be from Productivity Commission

We are aware that some members of the public have received unexpected emails claiming to be sent from the Productivity Commission. 

Read an update on this incident

Productivity Commission online forms unavailable

Our online forms are currently unavailable. As a result, we are currently not accepting submissions through the website. We are working to have this issue resolved as quickly as possible.

Performance benchmarking of Australian business regulation: Role of local government as regulator

Research report

  • Implementing and enforcing state and territory laws, rather than local laws, dominates local governments’ regulatory workload.
  • While the Commonwealth has very limited powers to make laws for local government, it can influence them via national frameworks, such as food safety.
  • In addition to local laws and quasi-regulatory instruments, rules can be imposed on business by ‘decisions’ determined under other laws, such as occurs with permits (including development approvals), licences, leases or registrations. Although they can impose costs on business and/or be anti-competitive, local instruments do not face as much scrutiny as state, territory or Commonwealth regulation.
  • Burdens on business arise from delays, information requirements, restrictions on approvals, fees and penalties. Local governments can also prevent a business from operating or realising opportunities. Building, planning and land-use regulations impose the largest burdens on business.
  • Unnecessary business burdens will be lower when local governments regulate well. The most important gaps in the support from states to local governments are:
    • insufficient consideration of local governments’ capacity to administer and enforce regulation before a new regulatory role is delegated to them
    • limited guidance and training on how to administer and enforce regulations
    • no clear indication and ranking of state regulatory priorities.
  • Leading practices for the states and the Northern Territory, include:
    • guidance to local government in writing regulation, such as Victoria’s Guidelines for Local Laws
    • incentives for local governments to achieve scale and scope economies in regulatory functions
    • periodic assessment of the stock of local regulation and state regulation requiring a local government role
    • efficient cost recovery for local government regulatory functions
    • guidance to local government in the scrutiny of the impact of laws
    • graduated review and appeal systems for both local government decisions and processes
    • having regulatory decisions made by bodies which take account of all impacts
    • removing or managing the conflicting objectives between local governments’ regulatory and other functions
    • a comprehensive central register of the state laws for which local government has a role in administration, enforcement and/or referral.