Skip to Content

Agricultural Competitiveness Taskforce

Productivity Commission submission

This submission was made to the Agricultural Competitiveness Taskforce on 17 April 2014. The submission addresses a number of the issues and questions raised in the Agricultural Competitiveness Issues Paper, drawing on projects undertaken by the Commission of relevance to the agricultural sector, and for framing agricultural policy.

Download the publication

  • Key points
  • Agricultural competitiveness is about advantage in markets. Australian producers and their supply chains need to continually innovate and improve their efficiency, and be highly attuned to international market developments.
  • Governments should focus on providing an environment that facilitates innovation and productivity gains by farm enterprises and allows market forces to allocate land, water and management skills to their highest valued uses.
    • Policies that: distort market signals (such as industry assistance); impede efficient risk management and structural adjustment (such as concessional loans for drought or impediments to farm aggregation); or discourage innovation (such as bans on genetically modified technologies) might help some producers, but at the expense of the competitiveness of the sector overall.
  • A strong capacity to adjust is crucial for agricultural competitiveness.
    • The agricultural sector has undergone significant structural change leading to fewer, but larger and more efficient farms. Policies that unnecessarily impede business entry, exit and efficient scale only undermine competitiveness.
  • Most risks are most efficiently managed by farm businesses themselves, enhancing their self-reliance and resilience.
  • Trading scarce water has increased farm output and productivity. Remaining unnecessary restrictions on water trading should be removed.
  • An efficient supply chain is critical.
    • Pro-competitive developments in grain port terminal infrastructure indicate scope to phase out and remove mandatory access arrangements for port terminals.
  • Infrastructure decisions including for transport and irrigation investments should be based on transparent and rigorous assessments. Review and reform of coastal shipping is urgently required.
  • Foreign investment can enhance export supply chains, promote innovation, provide capital and increase competition in domestic markets.
  • The greatest benefits of trade liberalisation would be realised on a multilateral basis.
    • Bilateral trade agreements might improve market access for some agricultural producers, but others inevitably miss out. Agreements almost always involve complex rules of origin offsetting access benefits and risk costly trade diversion.
  • Changes designed to increase the success rate for anti-dumping actions could be a double edged sword for agricultural producers, potentially increasing input costs and encouraging the introduction of similar arrangements by trading partners.

Printed copies

This publication is only available online.

Publications feedback

We value your comments about this publication and encourage you to complete and submit the publications feedback form.